..
For centuries giving birth at home was the normal thing to do, but
by the mid 1900's women began changing their birth setting by going
to hospitals.
As our understanding of anatomy, modern medicine, the
mechanics' of childbirth, and technology have significantly increased,
more and more women are exploring the idea of a home birth with trained
midwives.
As the
desire for home birth grows, the number of studies and statistical
data will continue to grow and give us a greater understanding of
the risks and benefits. The information below will help increase your
understanding as you move toward an informed decision.

Read about the safety of Home Birth with the CPM:
Certified Professional Midwife, in the British Medical Journal

Homebirth ~ Is it Safe?

by Henci Goer, author of
The Thinking Woman's Guide to a Better Birth

Outcomes of planned home birth: an integrative review.
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007 Jul-Aug;52(4):323-33.

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2008 Nov 6;128(21):2436-9.
Why Choose a Midwife?
.
.This video about midwifery advocacy, specific to a current MA bill,
was produced by volunteers from Our Bodies Ourselves
and Massachusetts Friends of Midwives.
Could home birth be for me?
Home birth might be an option for you if:
- You are having a healthy, low-risk pregnancy;
- You want to avoid episiotomy, cesarean section,
epidural and other interventions;
- You want to be surrounded by family and
friends;
- You want to be free to move around, change
positions, take a shower, and eat or drink freely during labor;
- You want to enjoy the comforts of home and
familiar surroundings.
Home birth is not for you if:
- You are diabetic;
- You have chronic high blood pressure, or
pre-eclampsia;
- You experienced preterm labor in the past, or may be at risk for preterm labor now;
- Your partner does not fully support your
decision to give birth at home.
All of life involves some risk, and this applies to giving birth and being
born, wherever the birth takes place. At home there is always the possibility,
no matter how small, of a tragic complication which could have been more
effectively dealt with in hospital.
Parents choosing home birth will consider
and come to terms with that risk, knowing that the risk of unnecessary
interventions and the possibility of damage to the mother or baby, or both, may
be far greater in hospital.
Hospital birth also increases the risk of the emotional/psychological
disruption of being in an unfamiliar institution. It is well documented that
other mammals, when disturbed in their nests in labor or moved to unfamiliar
surroundings, have longer labors with more complications. Entering hospital
undermines a woman's need to feel safe, secure and in familiar surroundings.
This in turn interferes with her ability to relax and ultimately give herself up
to the experience of birth..
This 'letting go' - the ability to respond to a
deep, instinctive knowledge of how to give birth to your baby - is an important
part of letting the birth process unfold a smoothly and safely as possible. Deciding on a hospital birth, and thus handing over responsibility to the
experts, may seem the easy option. The responsibility for choosing a home birth
is obviously yours and on the surface of things may seem more complex. But
the truth is, wherever you choose to give birth, it is still your baby, your
body and your responsibility to balance the risks and benefits of the services offered.
.
In the end, statistics alone cannot provide all the answers about where a
baby should be born. They may give you food for thought, help guide you through
the maze of conflicting view-points, help to free you from some popular
misconceptions, and perhaps make home birth a real option for you. To arrive at
a choice, which is right for you, it is important to go beyond statistical data
and consider the things which really influence a good birth outcome for both
mother and baby.
These include your own level of health, being well-nourished
throughout your pregnancy, the practical as well as emotional and psychological
support and care available to you during pregnancy, labor and beyond, the
skills of your midwife and your own intuitive sense of where your baby should be
born.
Many parents will anxiously sort through the pros and cons, but once they
have
chosen home birth, they discover a growing excitement and confidence
in the
rightness of their decision. Where to give birth is not a matter of
choosing
between physical safety or going with your feelings.
The two are inextricably
linked. Knowing this can help you
trust the wisdom of your instincts in
choosing
the right place for your baby to be born.
..
Certified Professional Midwife, Ina May Gaskin, mother of modern midwifery in the US, renowned author, and world-wide lecturer, has painstakingly gathered the following resources on home birth:
1. Abel S, Kearns, RA, 1991 "Birth Places: A Geographical
Perspective on Planned Home Birth in New Zealand," Social Science &
Medicine, Vol. 33, No. 7, 825-34.
2. Abernathy, Thomas J., Donna M. Lentjes,
1989 "Planned and Unplanned Home Births and Hospital Births in
Calgary, Alberta, 1984-87", Public Health Reports, Vol. 104, No. 4,
373-77.
3. Acheson, Louise A., Stanley E. Harris
and Stephen J. Zyzanski, 1980 "Patient Selection and Outcomes for
Out-of-Hospital Births in One Family Practice", The Journal of Family
Practice, Vol. 31, No. 2, 128-136.
4. Albers, Leah L., and Vern L. Katz,
"Birth Setting for Low-Risk Pregnancies, an Analysis of the Current
Literature", Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, Vol. 36, No. 4, July/August
1991, p. 215-220
5. Anderson, Rondi and Deborah Greener,
1991 "A Descriptive Analysis of Home Births Attended by CNMs in Two
Nurse-Midwifery Services", Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, Vol 36, No. 2,
95-103.
6. Anderson, Rondi and Patricia Murphy,
1995 "Outcomes of 11,788 Planned Home Births Attended by Certified
Nurse-Midwives: A Retrospective Descriptive Study," Journal of
Nurse-Midwifery, Vol. 40, No. 6, 483-492.
7. Bortin, S, Alzuguray M, Dowd J, and
Kalman J, 1994 "A Feminist Perspective on the Study of Home Birth:
Application of a Midwifery Care Framework," Journal of Nurse-Midwifery,
Vol. 39, No. 3, 142-9.
8. Boyer, Ernest L., 1990 "Midwifery in America: A Profession Reaffirmed", Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, Vol 35, No. 4, 214-19.
9.
Burnett, Claude A., James A. Jones, Judith Rooks, et al, 1980 "Home
Delivery and Neonatal Mortality in North Carolina", JAMA, Vol. 244, No.
24, 2741-45.
10. Cameron, J. C. et al, 1979 "Home Birth in Salt Lake County, Utah, American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 69, 716-717.
11.
Campbell, & Rona, MacFarlane, 1987 Where to Be Born? The Debate
and The Evidence. National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Radcliffe
Infirmary, Oxford, England.
12. Campbell, Rona, & MacFarlane,
Alison, 1986 "Place of Delivery: A Review," British Journal of
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 83, 675-83.
13. Campbell, Rona et al, 1984 "Home
births in England and Wales: Perinatal Mortality According to Intended
Place of Delivery," British Medical Journal, Vol. 289: 721-24.
14. Chamberlain, M et al., 1991 "Consumer
Interest in Alternatives to Physician-Centred Hospital Birth in
Ottawa," Midwifery, Vol. 7, No. 2, 74-81.
15. Crotty, Maria, Andrew T. Ramsay,
Rosemary Smart, and Annabelle Chan, "Planned Homebirths in South
Australia 1976-1987", 1990 Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 153, p.
664-71.
16. Cunningham JD, "Experiences of
Australian Mothers Who Gave Birth Either at Home, at a Birth Centre, or
in Hospital Labour Wards," 1993 Social Sciences & Medicine, Vol.
36, No. 4, 475-83.
17. Damstra-Wijmenga, "Home Confinement:
the Positive Results in Holland," 1984 Journal of the Royal College of
General Practitioners, Vol. 34, 425 -30 .
18. Buitendijk, S. 1994 "How Safe are
Dutch Home Births? In: Abrahams E (ED) Successful Home Birth and
Midwifery: the Dutch Model. Bergin, Garvey and Greenwood Press,
Westport, Connecticut.
19. Declerq, Eugene, "Out-of-Hospital
Births, US, 1978: Birthweight and Apgar Scores as Measures of Outcome,"
1984 Public Health Rep Vol. 99, No. 1, 63-73.
20. Declerq, Eugene, 1993 "Where Babies
Are Born and Who Attends Their Births: Findings from the Revised 1989
United States Standard Certificate of Live Birth," Obstetrics &
Gynecology, Vol. 81, No. 6, 997-1004.
21. Devitt, Neal, 1977 "The Transition from Home to Hospital Birth, U.S.," Birth & Family Journal, Vol. 4, No. 1, 47-58.
22. Durand, A. Mark, "The Safety of Home Birth: The Farm Study," American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 82, No. 3, 450-3 1992.
23.
Eskes, TK, 1992 "Home Deliveries in the Netherlands -- Perinatal
Mortality and Morbidity. International Journal of Gynaecology &
Obstetrics, Vol. 38, No. 3, 161-9.
24. Ford, Christine, Illife &
Franklin, 1991 "Outcome of Planned Home Births in an Inner City
Practice," British Medical Journal, Vol. 303, 1517-19.
25. Hafner-Eaton, C and Pearce, LK, 1995
"Birth Choices, the Law and Medicine: Balancing the Individual Freedoms
and Protection of the Public's Health," Journal of Health Politics,
Policy & Law, Vol. 19, No. 4, 813-35.
26. Hinds, M. Ward, Gershon H. Bergeisen
and David T. Allen, 1985 "Neonatal Outcome in Planned Versus Unplanned
Out-of-Hospital Births in Kentucky", JAMA, Vol. 253, No. 11, 1578-82.
27. Howe, K., 1988 "Home Births in South-west Australia," Medical Journal of Australia, Vol.149, 296-302.
28. Huygen, F. J., 1984 "Home Deliveries in Holland," Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, Vol. 34, 244-8.
29.
Janssen, Patricia A., et al, 1994 "Licensed Midwife-Attended,
Out-of-Hospital Births in Washington State: Are They Safe?" Birth, Vol.
21, No. 3, 141-8.
30. Klein, M. E., et al, 1983 "A
Comparison of Low-Risk Pregnant Women Booked for Delivery in Two
Systems of Care," British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Vol.
90, 118-128.
31. Kenny P et al, 1993 "Satisfaction with Postnatal Care -- The Choice of Home or Hospital, Midwifery, Vol. 9, No. 3, 146-53.
32.
Kleiverda, Gunilla, et al, 1990 "Place of Delivery in The Netherlands:
Maternal Motives & Background Variables Related to Preferences for
Home or Hospital Confinement," European Journal of Obstetrics &
Gynecology & Reproductive Biology, Vol. 36, 1-9.
33. Kleiverda, Gunilla, et al, 1991
"Place of Delivery in The Netherlands: Actual Location of Confinement,"
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology & Reproductive
Biology, Vol. 39, 139-46.
34. Kloosterman, G. J., 1984 "The Dutch
Experience of Domiciliary Confinements." In: Zander, L, Chamberlain, G.
(eds). Pregnancy Care for the 1980s. The Royal Society of Medicine.
London: Macmillan Press Ltd. 115-125.
35. Korte, Diana, "Infant Mortality: Lessons from Japan", Mothering, Winter 1992, 83 - 88.
36.
Koehler, M. S. et al, 1984 "Outcomes of a Rural Sonoma County Home
Birth Practice: 1976-1982. Birth, Vol. 11, No. 3, 165-169.
37. Lievaart, M. and DeJong, P., 1982
"Neonatal Morbidity in Deliveries Conducted by Midwives and
Gynecologists: A Study of the System of Obstetric Care Prevailing in
The Netherlands," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol.
144, 376-386. For critique of this "flawed" study, see "Obstetricians'
Flawed Study," P.E. Treffers MD, D. van Alten MD, The Practicing
Midwife, Vol. 1, No. 19, 1983. See also Reference 61.
38. MacVicar J et al. 1993 "Simulated
Home Delivery in Hospital: A Randomised Controlled Trial," British
Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Vol. 100, No. 4, 316-23.
39. Mallison, Mary B., "Gate Crashers", American Journal of Nursing, February 1990, p. 7.
40. McClain, C, 1981 "Women's Choice of Home or Hospital Birth," Journal of Family Practice, Vol. 12, 1033-38.
41. McQuarrie, H., 1980 "Home Delivery Controversy," Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 243, No. 17, p. 1747.
42.
Mehl, Lewis E., Gail H. Peterson, Michael Whitt and Warren E. Hawes,
1977 Outcomes of Elective Home Births: A Series of 1,146 Cases", The
Journal of Reproductive Medicine, Vol. 19, No. 5, 281-290.
43. Murphy, J.F., Marjorie Dauncey, O.P.
Gray, and I. Chalmers, 1984 "Planned and Unplanned Deliveries at Home:
Implications of a Changing Ratio", British Medical Journal, Vol. 288,
1429-32.
44. Myers, S, et al, 1990 "Unlicensed
Midwifery Practice in Washington state," American Journal of Public
Health, Vol. 80, 726-8.
45. Philipps, E., 1984 "Planned and Unplanned Deliveries at Home," British Medical Journal, Vol. 1, 1996-7.
46.
Rooks, Judith P., Norman L. Weatherby, et al, 1989 "Outcomes of Care
in Birth Centers", New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 321, p.
1804-11.
47. Rooks, Judith, "Low-Intervention Maternity Care," Journal of Family Practice, Vol. 31, No. 2, 125-7.
48.
Sakala C, 1993 "Midwifery Care and Out-of-Hospital Birth Settings: How
Do They Reduce Unnecessary Cesarean Section Births?" Social Science
& Medicine, Vol. 37, No. 10, 1233-50.
49. Schrader, Catharina. The Memoirs
(1693-1740) of the Frisian Midwife Catharina Schrader. 1987 Translated
and annotated by Hilary Marland, with introductory essays by M.J. van
Lieburg and G. J. Kloosterman. Rodopi, Amsterdam (available from Mrs.
L. J. Brooke, 4595 Club Dr., NE, Atlanta, GA 30319
50. Schramm, Wayne F., Diane E. Barnes and
Janice M. Bakewell, 1987 "Neonatal Mortality in Missouri Homebirths,
1978-84", AJPH, Vol. 77, No. 8, 930-35.
51. Shearer, J.M.L., 1985 "Five Year
Prospective Risk of Booking for a Home Birth in Essex", British Medical
Journal, Vol. 291, 1478-80.
52. Shy, KK, et al, 1980 "Out-of-Hospital
Delivery in Washington State, 1975 to 1977, American Journal of
Obstetrics & Gynecology, Vol. 137, 547-52.
53. Soderstrom, Bobbi, Paula J. Stewart,
Christabel Kaitell, and Marie Chamberlain, 1990 "Interest in
Alternative Birthplaces Among Women in Ottawa-Carleton", Canadian
Medical Association Journal, Vol. 142, No. 9, 963-9.
54. Sullivan, Deborah A. and Ruth Beeman,
1983 "Four Years' Experience with Home Birth by Licensed Midwives in
Arizona", AJPH, Vol. 73, No. 6, 641-5.
55. Tew, Marjorie, 1986 "Do Obstetric
Intranatal Interventions Make Births Safer?", British Journal of
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 93, 659-74.
56. Tew, Marjorie, 1985 "Place of Birth
and Perinatal Mortality," Journal of the Royal College of General
Practitioners, Vol. 35, 390-4.
57. Tew, Marjorie, 1978 "The Case against
Hospital Deliveries: the Statistical Evidence." In Kitzinger, S,
Davies, JA (eds). The Place of Birth. Oxford University Press: pp.
55-65.
58. Tew, Marjorie, 1986 "Do Obstetric
Intranatal Interventions Make Birth Safer?" British Journal of
Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Vol. 93, No. 7, 659-74.
59. Treffers, Pieter E., Martine Eskes,
Gunilla Kleiverda and Dik Van Alten, 1990 "Letter From Amsterdam: Home
Births and Minimal Medical Interventions", JAMA, Vol. 264, No. 17,
2203-08.
60. Treffers, P. and Laan, R., 1986
"Perinatal Mortality and Hospitalization at Delivery in The
Netherlands," British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Vol. 93,
690-3.
61. Treffers, P, et al, 1983
"Condemnation of the Obstetric Care in The Netherlands?" American
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 146, 871-2.
62. Tyson, Holliday, 1991 "Outcomes of 1001 Midwife-Attended Home Births in Toronto, 1983-1988, Birth, Vol. 18, No. 1, 14-9.
63.
Van Alten, D., M. Eskes and P.E. Treffers, 1989 "Midwifery in the
Netherlands. The Wormerveer Study; Selection Mode of Delivery,
Perinatal Mortality and Infant Morbidity", British Journal of
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 96, 656-62.
64. Wagner, Marsden. Pursuing the Birth Machine: The Search for Appropriate Birth Technology. ACE Graphics, Sydney, 1994.
65. Wood, LAC. 1981 "Obstetric Retrospect," J R Coll Gen Pract, Vol. 31, 80-90.
66.
Woodcock, Hazel C., Anne W. Read, Diane J. Moore, Fiona J. Stanley and
Carol Bower, 1990 "Planned Homebirths in Western Australia 1981-1987:
A Descriptive Study", The Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 153,
672-8.
67. Wynn, Margaret, 1985 "Birthplace Survey," New Generation, Vol. 4, 1-9.
68.
Zander, L. 1, 1981 "The Place of Confinement -- a Question of
Statistics or Ethics?" Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 7, 125-7.
69. Having a Baby in Europe, Copenhagen, World Health Organization, 1985.
70. Health Committee of the House of Commons, Report on Maternity Services, March 1992
71. Pearse W 1987 "Parturition: Places and Priorities," American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 77, 923-4.
72.
Ackermann-Leibrich U et al 1994 "Comparing Home to Hospital
Deliveries: Recruitment, Referrals, and Neonatal Outcome," Soz
Praventivmed Vol. 39, No. 1, 28.
73. British Medical Journal Editorial
1996 "Home Birth: Safe in Selected Women, and with Adequate
Infrastructure and Support," British Medical Journal, Vol. 313, No.
7068. 1276-7.
74. Davies J, et al 1996 "Prospective
Regional Study of Planned Home Birth," British Medical Journal, Vol.
313, No. 7068, 1302-6.
75. Northern Region Perinatal Mortality
Survey Group 1996 "Collaborative Survey of Perinatal Loss in Planned
and Unplanned Home Births," British Medical Journal, Vol. 313, No.
7068, 1306-9.
76. Weigers T et al 1996 "Outcome of
Planned Home and Planned Hospital Births in Low Risk Pregnancies:
Prospective Study in Midwifery Practices in the Netherlands," British
Medical Journal, Vol. 313, No. 7068, 1309-13.
77. Ackermann-Leibrich U et al 1996
"Home versus Hospital Deliveries: Follow Up Study of Matched Pairs for
Procedures and Outcome," British Medical Journal, Vol. 313, No. 7068,
1313-18.
78. Olesen O 1997 "A Meta-analysis of the Safety of Home Birth," Birth, March 1997.
79.
Matsuoka, E 1995 "Is Hospital the Safest Place for Birth?" Gebären -
Ethnomedizinische Perspektiven und neue Wege, Special Vol. 8, 293-304.
80. Declercq E 1994 "The Trials of Hanna
Porn: The Campaign to Abolish Midwifery in Massachusetts," American
Journal of Public Health, Vol. 84, No. 6, 1022-8.